Are you keeping your New Year's resolutions?|
Story Archives: United States needs McCain
- 2013 - 320 articles
- 2012 - 1160 articles
- 2011 - 1177 articles
- 2010 - 810 articles
- 2009 - 779 articles
- 2008 - 949 articles
- December 2008 - 88 articles
- November 2008 - 73 articles
- October 2008 - 71 articles
- October 30th, 2008 (Thursday) - 3 articles
- October 28th, 2008 (Tuesday) - 15 articles
- October 21st, 2008 (Tuesday) - 12 articles
- October 19th, 2008 (Sunday) - 1 articles
- October 16th, 2008 (Thursday) - 2 articles
- October 14th, 2008 (Tuesday) - 17 articles
- October 9th, 2008 (Thursday) - 1 articles
- October 8th, 2008 (Wednesday) - 1 articles
- October 7th, 2008 (Tuesday) - 18 articles
- October 4th, 2008 (Saturday) - 1 articles
- September 2008 - 91 articles
- August 2008 - 98 articles
- July 2008 - 98 articles
- June 2008 - 60 articles
- May 2008 - 66 articles
- April 2008 - 108 articles
- March 2008 - 70 articles
- February 2008 - 48 articles
- January 2008 - 78 articles
|United States needs McCain|
(Editor's Note: A few weeks ago, we endorsed Sen. John McCain for president. Though edited for space concerns, the endorsement of McCain is being published again, prior to the Nov. 4 general election.)
Voters will go to the polls next week to choose a new president.
The decision voters make on Election Day, Nov. 4, could be the most important decision they have ever made in a presidential election. It also could be the most important decision they will ever make in picking a new leader of what still is the most powerful and most successful industrialized country on the planet.
Concerns for the country's national security in light of the U.S. military's involvement in a war in the Middle East have played a prominent role in the 2008 presidential campaign. The economy, though, apparently matters most to voters. Of course, that is the case because of uncertainty over the stability of the economy in the United States and beyond.
Thus, we must ask ourselves a simple question: Which presidential candidate—Republican Sen. John Sidney McCain or Democratic Sen. Barack Hussein Obama—is most qualified to lead America during these turbulent times?
We believe the answer to that question is a simple one.
Sen. McCain is far more qualified and better prepared to serve as president of the United States.
A graduate of the Naval Academy, McCain hails from a military family. His father and his grandfather were Navy admirals, who served our nation with honor.
Sen. McCain himself was a fighter pilot during the Vietnam War, who was shot down in battle and subsequently spent more than five years as a prisoner of war. Injuries he incurred as a POW afflict him to this day.
Following McCain's retirement from the Navy in 1981, he was elected one year later to the U.S. House of Representatives. Four years later, he was elected to the U.S. Senate, succeeding an outstanding senator from Arizona, Barry Goldwater, whose presidential campaign in 1964 raised an important question: Is it the government's responsibility to provide for scores of Americans who lack the initiative to better their own lives?
Throughout his years as a member of the Congress, McCain has distinguished himself as a watchdog, if you will, of the people's money. His persistent questioning, or criticism, of wasteful government spending earned him few friends. He is the only member of the Senate who refuses to request "earmarks," or special line-item appropriations, for his home state of Arizona.
McCain recognizes, as we do, that high taxes serve as a deterrent to economic growth. He recognizes, too, as we do, that some taxes are necessary to pay for the basic services that government was intended to provide for the people.
Those positions are a stark contrast to McCain's opponent, Sen. Obama.
In the brief period of time that Obama has served in the Senate—less than four years—he has garnered almost $1 billion in pork barrel spending for his home state of Illinois. Much of that pork-barrel spending was directed to wasteful government programs in Chicago, a city known far and wide for its corrupt politics.
And it was in Chicago in which Obama cut his teeth in the political arena, launching his first bid for public office in the presence of his friend and political ally, Bill Ayers, an admitted domestic terrorist who applauded the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks in New York and Washington. That's the same Bill Ayers who is on record encouraging children to murder their parents as a means to achieve equality in America.
Ayers is not the only radical from Chicago who Obama befriended.
Another one is the Rev. Jeremiah Wright, who was Obama's pastor for some 20 years. That's the same Jeremiah Wright who has a track record of denouncing the white race. He also blames white America for the problems the African-American community encounters today. And that's the same Jeremiah Wright who apparently believes God "damned" America. At least that's what Jeremiah Wright said from the pulpit.
While we believe it is unconscionable that a member of the U.S. Senate and would-be president of the United States would align himself with bigoted individuals like Ayers and Wright, it is Obama's political beliefs, or positions, that concern us most.
An advocate of class warfare, Obama wants to raise taxes. He wants to raise taxes on corporations, upper-income Americans, and he also is on record in support of higher taxes for what we would describe as middle-class Americans. That's a fact, though Obama tries in vain to play it down, or distance himself from those positions while peddling his "plan" for America on the campaign trail.
We don't buy it.
We don't buy it either that Obama is an expert on foreign affairs. If he was, he would abandon any pretense of engaging heads of states that sponsor terrorist activities such as Iran.
However, that is exactly what Obama says he would do if he is elected president. And that's a dangerously irresponsible position to take.
While it is a forgone conclusion Obama knows little about foreign policy, he does not possess any military experience either. Furthermore, it is obvious Obama does not possess any credible knowledge of the military history of the United States. If he did, he would recognize setting a time line for the withdrawal of American troops from Iraq would entail a dangerous course of action, which certainly would result in the deaths of American servicemen and women.
It is worth noting as well that Obama possesses one of the most liberal voting records of any member of the U.S. Senate. Something tells us the American people—blinded to some degree by emotions—have overlooked that fact.
Yet, we would be remiss if we did not acknowledge Obama is a talented man. After all, less than four years ago he was a member of the state Senate in Illinois. He has come a long way.
While we admire Obama's abilities politically speaking, he has no business serving as president of the United States of America.
That job belongs to Sen. John McCain.